The Mavericks Receive Their Compensation for Sending Luka Dončić to the Lakers

The saga of the Luka Doncić trade just added another intriguing chapter. Against 1.8 percent odds, the Mavericks landed the first overall pick in this year’s draft lottery—almost guaranteeing that they’ll select Cooper Flagg.

This development further fuels speculation that the league orchestrated Luka’s move to the Lakers, aiming to bring the biggest European star to the NBA’s most valuable franchise and boost declining ratings. In return, the Mavericks received Anthony Davis—and now, likely, Cooper Flagg. If Kyrie Irving returns, Dallas is projected to be a serious contender next season.

Now, all eyes are on Giannis. Will he leave the Bucks to join a big-market team. And what about Kevin Durant? Another ring-chasing move seems inevitable.

In a franchise-based league like the NBA, manipulating certain outcomes makes business sense. Higher ratings and sold-out arenas benefit all team owners. When marquee teams like the Knicks and Lakers are in championship contention, it’s more profitable—even for owners of the Bucks, Hornets, or Pelicans—despite the structural disadvantage it creates for small-market teams.

Several referees have come forward after retirement, admitting they were instructed to favor Michael Jordan and the Bulls with calls they wouldn’t have made for other teams. A legendary Jordan dominating the league was worth more to the NBA than a fair competition.

The infamous 1985 draft that sent Patrick Ewing to the Knicks? Widely considered rigged, even if David Stern denied it – just look at the crease on the envelope that was selected.

The league will never admit that Luka was sent to L.A. at its request—or that Dallas was rewarded with the No. 1 pick as compensation. But frankly, that’s the only explanation that makes sense for a lopsided trade that turned Nico Harrison into the laughingstock of NBA fandom.

I’m curious to see how the league plans to revive the Warriors once Father Time finally catches up to Curry and Draymond. Maybe sending Giannis to Golden State is an idea Adam Silver is already considering…

Blogging in English or Your Native Language

If you’ve read any of my articles before, you’ve probably noticed that English is not my native language. I make mistakes—more than I’d like—but with every article I write, I get a little better. Despite the challenges, blogging in English has too many advantages for me to stick to my native language instead.

Writing in a Non-English Language

I’ve run several websites in the past, most of them in German. Writing in my native language had its benefits: I could express myself more precisely and made fewer mistakes. It also felt easier and took less time.

But I quickly discovered the limitations of blogging in German. Back then, I ran a niche site that built a small but dedicated community. Still, compared to similar English-language sites, the reach was modest. Over time, it felt like I had already reached the maximum possible audience. In short: I peaked early.

Part of that was due to the niche I was targeting, but it was also because writing in German limited my potential audience.

Now, I’m in this for the long run. I plan to create content online for the rest of my life. My basic needs are covered, my bills are paid, I’m debt-free, and I even have a bit of “fuck you” money saved up. That gives me the freedom to think long-term. And long-term, the audience for English-language content is hundreds—if not thousands—of times larger than for German content.

Writing in English as a Non-Native Speaker

Making mistakes doesn’t look great. I understand that hiring a native speaker to polish my writing would seem more professional. But there are also benefits to making mistakes.

Learning – You can’t improve without making mistakes. Of course, mistakes alone don’t guarantee progress, but if you never act out of fear of getting it wrong, you’ll never move forward.

Personality – One of the best things about blogs is the personality behind them. Big corporations may deliver flawless content, but readers know there’s a faceless entity behind it. Blogs are different—they’re personal. A one-person show creates a direct connection between the writer and the reader. Mistakes can actually enhance that authenticity. They reflect honesty and vulnerability.

AI – In the near future, the only way to tell if content is written by a human might be the presence of small mistakes. AI will produce perfect output. We may end up in a kind of reverse Turing Test, where imperfection becomes proof of humanity.

The Trap of Perfection – Striving for perfection can paralyze you. As a hobby fiction writer, I get stuck in endless revision cycles. Even after five rounds of editing, I still want to tweak sentences. But perfection isn’t the best goal when publishing content. Getting your thoughts out of your head and onto the page matters more—even if it means making a few mistakes along the way.

Will English Always Dominate the Internet?

The Western world is going through a period of change. The Arab world and China are gaining influence, while America’s dominance appears to be waning. It’s possible that one day, Arabic or Chinese could rival English as the dominant language online.

But for now, English remains the global standard. Most people in the Western world learn English in school, at least to a basic level. Any significant shift in language dominance—where Arabic or Chinese are taught globally—will likely take decades. And who knows? The West could still experience a renaissance that boosts its global influence even further.

For the foreseeable future, English will remain the language of the internet.

So if you want to grow online—write in English.

Write Better Books | Write About the Details of Work and Hobbies

I like Sherlock Holmes, Hercule Poirot, Jack Reacher—and most of all, James Bond. Writing my own stories has made me think more deeply about why I’m drawn to these characters. Every year, millions of crime thriller stories are published, featuring millions of new characters and plotlines. So why, to me, is James Bond the most compelling of them all?

The answer might lie in the details that surround Bond’s life. In Ian Fleming’s first novel, Casino Royale, Bond doesn’t do much besides playing cards. The story isn’t only about that, but the central plot revolves around a high-stakes card game called Baccarat. I had never played it and didn’t know the rules before reading the book—yet I enjoyed every page.

Trying to understand why, I realized it was precisely because I didn’t know the game that I found it so enjoyable to read about. Fleming introduced it with such clarity and detail that I understood it bit by bit. Casino Royale became a doorway into a new world for me.

The same applies to the details of Bond’s eating, drinking, and lifestyle habits. He knows how to properly smoke a cigar, which tailored suit to wear, which shoes to choose, and what fish swim in the waters around Jamaica. Every Bond story feels like a journey to places I’ve never been and experiences I’ve never had.

The details of his work and hobbies set him apart. Nothing about Bond is generic. There are small details that everything he does and is interesting. What he eats, how he drinks, the gimmicks provided by Q, the relationship with M, his license to kill, and the back and forth between him and Moneypenny.

This is the essence of a strong character: he knows his craft inside and out – at work, in his apre time, and in his relationships. Bond is a master of his world, living the kind of life readers dream about. And that mastery is best conveyed through specific, unique details—like superiors with one-letter names, an elite double-O license to kill, or an expert’s knowledge of playing Baccarat.

With Bond, we get the thrilling life of a spy. But the same principle applies to less glamorous professions. A carpenter’s life can be just as engaging—if it’s described as vividly and authentically as Bond’s world. In fact, if done well, a character can be fascinating no matter how unusual their job or hobby might be. Imagine an undertaker as your protagonist, or someone working on an oil rig, a ghostwriter, or even an ostrich breeder. As long as you can describe their world deeply, your character will captivate readers—even if those readers know nothing about undertaking, oil rigs, or ostrich farming.

The same goes for hobbies. Why does Sherlock Holmes play the violin?

Because it gives him depth. It opens a window into his mind and adds dimension to his personality. With a few well-placed details, even something like playing the violin becomes a unique experience for the reader—one most people will never have firsthand.

To Conlcude: If you want to design a great character, design a detailed world around him and his habits. If you can do that, you can even make a familiar story feel fresh and exciting. Ian Fleming’s Bond is the best example for it.

Blogging in the Age of AI

“Blogging is dead,” they say—and compared to a decade ago, they’re not wrong. I remember checking my RSS feed daily to see if any of my 10 to 20 favorite bloggers had posted something new. Most of them published fresh content every day. It was a great time.

Then, people migrated to social media—especially Twitter. Blogging became secondary, a supplement to tweeting 20 times a day. Then came vlogging (popularized by Casey Neistat), and blogging lost even more ground. In recent years, livestreaming has taken the top spot as the primary way to connect with an audience in a personal way.

The next evolution, inevitably, is AI.

It’s hard to predict exactly what AI will replace, but it will replace a lot. One thing I can already say with confidence: writing listicles like “10 ways to make money online” or “7 secrets to getting a six-pack” is over.

Today, I use free AI tools to design my nutrition plan, my workouts, my business strategies, and my schedules. I ask it questions about history, philosophy, and even religion. It researches faster, gives tailored advice, and—unlike most influencers—it doesn’t try to sell me a new e-course (yet!).

So, where does blogging still have a place in this new internet era?

It’ll be a small niche, for sure. And it can only be personal.

What I mean is this: instead of writing “10 ways to make money online,” we should write about how we personally make money online. What mistakes did we make? What successes did we have? What tools did we use? If you’re starting a fitness blog, don’t write generic tips—write about your training and nutrition. Tell us how you lost weight and built a six-pack. Everything else? AI already does it better.

And here I am, trying to write about becoming an author in 2025. The only way this blog can succeed is if I make it personal. That means being transparent—showing you what I’ve tried, and what the results were. If I fail and see no growth at all, I have to show you that too.

This is something AI can’t do. No matter how advanced it gets, it will never be me. Thus, if you want to read about me, you’ll have to read this blog.

I believe this is the only path forward—not just for blogging, but for YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter too: Be yourself. Be honest. Be authentic.

Otherwise, AI will replace you.

In fact, it might already have.

Making Comics With Midjourney (Update for V7)

The new version of Midjourney dropped a few days ago, with new features being rolled out gradually. The biggest leap so far has been the introduction of omni reference, which was only made available recently. It allows you to use objects and characters as references and add them to specific scenes, which (on paper) sounds like a giant improvement for making AI comics. Thus, I was really excited to test it with the next issue of my “test” comic, The Last Superhero.

However, I completely failed at getting anything going.

The reason? V7 appears to have very aggressive prompt filters now. Despite many attempts and creative rewording, none of my prompts were accepted. Eventually, I became so frustrated that I gave up on the idea of using Midjourney altogether. All the improvements in features and image quality are meaningless if I can’t even generate a basic scene of a superhero being shot by a villain. I couldn’t even prompt “guy in pain being strapped to a chair…” without it being flagged. Nearly all action scenes were impossible to create due to the overly aggressive AI word filter now in place.

I hope the Midjourney team eventually realizes that filtering so many words renders the tool useless for a wide range of creative tasks. I understand their desire to avoid extreme gore or explicit content, but there must be a better solution. For instance, prompts involving violence should be allowed when clearly framed in a context like “comic book style.”

For now, I’ll be looking into other models and revisit Midjourney with version 8—which hopefully delivers more reasonable prompt restrictions.

Conclusion:
If you’re looking to create AI-generated comics, Midjourney currently isn’t the tool to use.