Sounds like a mixed result. Yesterday, Grok basically declared long-form content on X to be a waste of time if you don’t write threads that are easily scanable. Now, X Articles are “great”???
Maybe my monthly review format on X wasn’t that bad after all.
You can follow my Grok Diary in real time here: @michael_brig
Seems like Grok doesn’t recommend using X Articles. I thought having this monthly review post as an article might be a good idea, but maybe it isn’t. I’ll do some more questioning with Grok about the topic before making a decision.
You can follow my Grok Diary in real time here: @michael_brig
I’m still refining the format. But word count, time spent, milestones, and lessons learned should be part of it.
You can follow my Grok Diary in real time here: @michael_brig
Seems like I should rethink my approach to posting daily word counts. Maybe a weekly recap with more details is a better idea.
You can follow my Grok Diary in real time here: @michael_brig
I never really asked Grok if it’s a good idea to run this project publicly in real time. To actually grow on X I surely need to do more than just this, but it seems like it’s a good foundation for an interesting profile to follow for readers.
You can follow my Grok Diary in real time here: @michael_brig