Night Sky (Movie/Show Review #13)

I like my sci-fi shows, and I’m also a fan of J.K. Simmons, so I was excited about Night Sky. My watchlist is completely packed, though, so I’m late to the party once again—the show was released almost four years ago. But I finally got to see the 8 episodes last week.

As usual with streaming services, if a show doesn’t go viral immediately, it gets nuked pretty quickly. Shame on them, because many shows only find their footing over time. Just look at the first season of Star Trek: The Next Generation. It was a mess. But in season two, the production quality improved, and the character development and world-building became genius for the six seasons that followed.

We’ll never know where Night Sky might have gone, because they pulled the plug far too early.

The show itself is well made. Acting is great, suspense is intriguing, and the cinematography pleasing. It starts slowly, yes, but the premise is a good one for every sci-fi fan. I would have loved to see where the story was heading.

But again—we’ll never know.

If you enjoy slow-burn sci-fi, it’s worth a watch. Just be aware that almost nothing is revealed: no real answers, no resolved storylines. What a shame.

Chernobyl (Movie/Show Review #12)

You never really know whether entertainment media tells the true story of a historical event. They lie to us about many things, bend the truth to fit their narrative, and sometimes replace real historical figures, and even invert entire realities to serve political ideologies.

But when I watch shows that depict the sheer evil of communist Soviet Russia, I’m quick to believe most of it.

The current system clearly wants us to live under a state-controlled form of communism, which is why mainstream narratives often portray communism and its pre-form, socialism, in a more favorable light.

A show like Chernobyl is therefore not something I would expect to exaggerate the truth. If anything, I assume reality was even more disgusting than what we see on screen.

From a technical standpoint, the show is outstanding. The writing, cinematography, and acting are excellent throughout. It’s a top-notch production made by very skilled people. Stellan Skarsgård is in it—one of my favorites—and he delivers a fantastic performance as always. That said, the entire cast is great.

Ironically, the female protagonist who is willing to fight the communist system was entirely invented and serves as a placeholder for numerous male Soviet scientists. So yes—there’s your liberal feminist propaganda, pushed even into a show like this.

If you watch Chernobyl as a historical piece, it makes your blood boil. The communist regime “disappeared” far more people than we will ever know, and one of the greatest crimes it committed was Chernobyl. So many people suffered under state rule in the mass experiment called the Soviet Union that I genuinely can’t understand how so many people today see socialism, or even communism, as something good.

If you give the state absolute power, it will abuse it absolutely. Chernobyl was not just an “accident”; it was another example of state failure, killing innocent people on a massive scale.

Watch the show for an example of that, or what it for the entertainment value. But definitively watch it, as it’s a great show.

The Dropout (Movie/Show Review #11)

It’s a good show that takes its time in places, though it feels somewhat rushed toward the end. Still, it is well produced and competently made.

The Story of The Dropout

The series tells the story of Elizabeth Holmes fooling the world—and herself—into believing she was the female version of Steve Jobs. Everyone went along with it: investors, the media, politicians. They desperately wanted to believe in the feminist narrative that women can do it all.

The show doesn’t explore this in great depth; it even repeatedly frames Holmes’ downfall as an inversion of the true reality. At one point, a character says something along the lines of: “When she finally fails, it will be the biggest blow to all the good female entrepreneurs out there.” The underlying message seems to be that the patriarchy is still out there, waiting to tear women down.

What the show never really addresses is that Holmes only rose to fame because she was a woman.

The supposedly patriarchal Western world wanted a female CEO superstar. Politicians helped. Investors helped. The media helped. Everyone played a role in turning every lie she told into an accepted truth—until it inevitably collapsed and reality exposed the fraud.

Ironically, it was mostly men—the so-called patriarchy—who made Holmes famous. The role of politics is only briefly touched upon, but figures like Henry Kissinger were on Theranos’ board of directors very early on, providing political connections and access to funding. The media is portrayed as the force that ultimately unmasked Holmes and revealed the truth, yet it was the same media that aggressively promoted her and Theranos in the early days as a young female genius. She fit the feminist rhetoric perfectly and satisfied the desire for a female icon in the tech CEO space.

The Story of Theranos

In the end, Theranos was the story of a woman and an Indian man scamming Western elites by exploiting leftist virtue signaling. The company was marketed as a force for good—helping the poor and the sick, fighting evil capitalist corporations at the top of the industry with revolutionary innovation, all while claiming to make the world a better place.

Add a female CEO to win over feminists. Add an Indian man behind the scenes who actually ran things, and you get the multicultural angle as well.

It was a socialist-leftist wet dream. Theranos received endless benefit of the doubt until the scam became impossible to ignore.

It is said that investors lost more than $900 million. One can’t help but wonder how much taxpayer money was also poured into this black hole.

Conclusion

The Dropout is a good watch—one that is likely to make your blood boil. It doesn’t cover all the factors involved, particularly the political networks that enabled Theranos’ rise, but it succeeds as an interesting character study: of a woman who eventually believed her own lies, and of a liberal bubble caught in the web she and her Indian handler spun.

I Miss Baywatch (Movie/Show Review #10)

When Baywatch first aired in Germany, I wasn’t even ten years old. David Hasselhoff was already a big star thanks to Knight Rider, but Baywatch made him the biggest TV icon of that era.

The very first episode hooked me right away. The stories were simple, and the characters were all slight variations of the same good-hearted person who wants to do the right thing—sometimes failing until a friend steps in to help.

Of course, Baywatch became a global phenomenon largely because of its beautiful women. Erika Eleniak was a perfect ten, portraying the kind, loving, and caring Shauni McLane. When she left the show, Pamela Anderson rose to international stardom as C.J. Parker. Over the years, actresses like Yasmine Bleeth and Nicole Eggert were stunning additions to the cast. For the female audience, the producers also cast plenty of ripped male models.

But as a teenager, I never saw Baywatch as the “soft p**n” it might have been intended to be from the start. I liked the characters, the beach scenes, the sunshine, and the overall kindness of the show. Sure, the stories never evolved toward any real complexity; there was basically no character development, and you could predict the ending after the opening credits.

Yet it was entertaining. It was heart-warming. It was simply nice TV.

The world of Baywatch was uncomplicated and good: beautiful people, beautiful friendships, and big, beautiful hearts.

I wanted to live in that world. I still do. Today’s world makes me long even more for that idealized early-90s California beachfront life.

Our current world is dark, dangerous, and depressing—which is why so many shows today are dark, dangerous, and depressing too. I wish we could go back to a time when we were still allowed to dream of a life that looked like Baywatch—and be naive enough to believe that such a life could come true.

Jean-Claude Van Johnson (Movie/Show Review #9)

It’s a bit older now, but what a great show it is. Unfortunately, it was cancelled after just one season. Still, the six episodes we did get are very entertaining and surprisingly funny.

Jean-Claude Van Damme was one of my favorite childhood action stars, but he went off track in the mid-90s due to cocaine — as he has openly admitted. After being pushed out of Hollywood, he spent quite a while making direct-to-DVD and B-movies in Europe. But every now and then, there’s a real gem hidden among the forgettable stuff he has made after 1999.

JCVD, the movie, was a fantastic surprise — and Jean-Claude Van Johnson is as well.

The show is very self-referential and pokes fun at Van Damme’s most famous movies while still honoring them. The humor is nostalgic and meta; half the jokes are hard to understand if you haven’t seen those films — Timecop, for example.

But if you grew up with ’80s and ’90s action movies, the show is pure entertainment. And if you’re a Jean-Claude fan, you’ll definitely laugh out loud many times.