Wednesday Season 2 (Movie/Show Review #3)

The first season of Wednesday was great in many ways — from the directing and set design to the acting and the story. It all worked. I especially hope whoever choreographed Wednesday’s dance scene got a massive raise, because that moment was pure perfection.

It seemed like everyone loved it, so it’s no surprise that Netflix ordered more. (I’ve heard at least three seasons are planned.)

I finally got around to watching the eight-episode second season last week, and I have to say — it’s still good. The production quality remains top-notch. The directing, sets, score, and characters are all on par with Hollywood-level filmmaking. You can clearly tell when Tim Burton was more involved in directing, though, as his episodes once again stand out as the highlights of the season.

However, the writing has taken a noticeable dip. There are simply too many characters, each with their own side plot. As a result, the main storyline feels diluted and reduced to a framework that merely ties all the other plots together.

Another major issue is the miscasting of Gomez and Morticia. This was already a weak point in the first season, though it wasn’t too distracting since both characters had limited screen time. Unfortunately, they get much more focus this season — and it hurts the show. Nothing against Luis Guzmán, but his portrayal of Gomez just isn’t my cup of tea. He turns the character into a comedic oddball, lacking the charm and sophistication of his predecessors. Catherine Zeta-Jones looks almost frozen in place — her expression so stiff that it conveys little to no emotion thanks to lots of botox sessions I’d assume. When the two share a scene, their lack of chemistry makes things even more awkward.

Overall, everything the first season did great, the second does worse. But as the first season was so well done, the second still turns out to be good. But is Season 2 a must-watch? Sadly, no.

Adolescence (Weekly Movie/Show Review #1)

I’ve decided to dedicate one day of the week to reviewing movies or shows. My mainstream media consumption has dropped drastically since the early 2000s, but I still occasionally watch the stuff everyone seems to be talking about.

As an author in progress, I’m naturally interested in how other storytellers design their characters, develop their plots, and craft their dialogue. So I try to make it a habit to watch at least one or two films a week—even when the major sports leagues are in full swing, work is demanding, and social media is having its latest heyday.

A few days ago, Adolescence was back in the headlines after winning several awards. I can certainly understand the recognition for the young actor who played the boy—he was excellent, especially in the episode where he’s interviewed by the female detective.

But the overall praise the show receives feels somewhat manufactured.

Adolescence tackles one of the main socio-political narratives that the establishment seems eager to promote: “Men are bad—therefore, we need more state control to correct them.”

The show is set in England, where women are statistically far more likely to be threatened by the consequences of mass migration. To avoid that uncomfortable topic, the creators chose to make the killer a white boy—effectively inverting real-world crime statistics.

Instead of sparking a conversation about migration, the series redirects the discussion toward misogyny. As a result, Adolescence becomes a subtle yet insidious piece of propaganda that’s now reportedly used in classrooms to “educate” boys—what a joke.

The show itself doesn’t dig very deep. It never ventures beyond what’s politically acceptable and feels like a typical product of a system that takes no creative risks and refuses to explore the root causes of the issues it raises out of fear of getting cancelled.

Awards are handed out. Critics adore it. In today’s climate, that’s often a clear sign of something not worth your time.

Still, the series holds a respectable 8.1 rating on IMDb, suggesting that audiences enjoyed it.

I couldn’t—despite great acting Adolescence is simply too ideologically driven for my taste.

Adolescence on IMDB

The Idol – Season 1 Review

This show was torn apart by critics and audiences alike. I tend to enjoy unusual films and series that most people can’t quite connect with, so I had to check it out for myself.

The Idol follows a pop singer (played by Lily-Rose Depp) who finds herself at a career crossroads after a public breakdown. She meets Tedros (The Weeknd), a mysterious nightclub manager and self-proclaimed guru who seemingly reignites her creative spark.

Critics described the show as “bordering on pornography” and lacking in substance. The explicit scenes were a bit much for me, too. They felt unnecessarily graphic, though not quite as extreme as some have made them out to be. Yes, Lily-Rose Depp wears revealing outfits and appears nude in several scenes that felt unnecessary, but it’s not accurate to say the show is solely about erotica.

What I do agree with is that the story lacks depth. And that’s a shame, because the premise is unique and had a lot of potential. The biggest letdown was the final twist—it wasn’t properly set up and left me with more questions than answers.

The strongest aspects of the series are the cinematography and the music, both of which are excellent.

With a better script, The Idol could have been fantastic. The concept and visual design are top-notch. The first two episodes are suspenseful and refreshingly different. Unfortunately, the later episodes derail everything with forced and unconvincing character developments. It’s a pity—this is exactly the kind of show I want to see, if only it had been written better.