It Seems People in Germany Are Being Massively Censored on Twitter

I had my doubts, but when Elon bought Twitter and brought back many of the so-called controversial voices, I also had my hopes. Over the last few weeks, however, more and more people are reporting mass shadow-banning of accounts that critically discuss developments in Germany.

My account is by no means large—I’ve gathered around 900 followers, most of whom are primarily looking for a refollow. But I have a blue checkmark, which I pay for to support Elon’s attempt at creating a free speech platform. With that checkmark, a “response boost” is promised. In simple terms, accounts with a blue checkmark should appear first under tweets, while those without appear later. I once read that it’s a threefold boost; others say fivefold. I’m not sure which is correct, but a boost was definitely advertised when subscribed two years ago.

Yesterday, I went over several responses I posted the past few days and found some with only a single impression (which should have been my own). How is it possible to get such low visibility when a boost is promised? And how is it possible to get so few impressions when you have 900 followers?

I’m not expecting thousands of impressions, but getting just one is hard to explain without considering censorship and shadow-banning.

I’ve heard it’s even worse in the UK. Large US accounts are also reporting a recent sharp drop in reach.

Have the censorship overlords now reached Elon?

He made an official announcement this week that the AI algorithm is about to be updated, which should “solve some issues.” I don’t expect it to solve the problem of government censorship, though.

If things stay the way they are, Twitter is not a platform I’m going to invest much time in anymore. I might use it for posting links and “Free Book Promo” announcements and will check daily if readers reach out (you can say hi to me here). But I’m not going to create original content for Twitter without a fair playing field—something it seems German accounts not affiliated with the system do not have.

Instead, I’ll focus on writing daily for my blog (which is growing), creating video content on YouTube and Rumble, and, of course, writing short stories and books. There’s plenty of work to do there anyway.

1984 by George Orwell (Books to Read #2)

Everyone has heard of the book. Whenever those in power see their influence waning, they claim the other side is trying to create an Orwellian state.

The former Green Party minister of economics in Deutschland actually wrote the foreword for the latest German translation of Orwell’s timeless classic. This is a textbook example of what Orwell wrote about: the inversion of reality. As it was (and is) mostly the Sozialist Green Parties in Germany that are building a state of totalitarian censorship — as exemplified by the same Green Party minister having a German citizen arrested just for calling him a dimwit on Twitter at the beginning of the year. Crazy times.

Anyway — most people know about 1984. But how many have actually read it? Some are forced to in school. And when you are forced to do something, you’re unlikely to enjoy it — which means you’ll probably learn very little.

So the real question is: how many people have read the book because they wanted to? I would assume not many. Because the book opens your eyes to state power and how the media inverts reality to keep that power running, and I see millions in every Western country not understanding that at all.

Orwell’s absolute genius shines through when he dissects how Big Brother uses language to destroy people’s ability to think: can you think about freedom when the state has censored the word “freedom” so much that nobody even remembers that the word existed?

Cognitive dissonance is another brilliant aspect of the story — explained in the final torture scene, where the protagonist Winston must deny reality before his very eyes in order to end the suffering inflicted by the personification of the state: O’Brien.

What Orwell missed, though: the deconstruction of gender and race that has been happening for the last 50 years. But what he unveiled more than anyone else was how wars are used to keep people in check. There is always a war going on since forever and the reason why is shown in 1984.

Today, the so-called debt-based economy and the resulting never-ending materialistic consumption have somewhat replaced the need for large conventional wars. But Orwell couldn’t foresee that, because it was Nixon who detached the U.S. dollar from the gold standard in 1971, long after Orwell’s death.

However, if you add an understanding of the debt-based economy, gender deconstruction, and mass migration to what 1984 teaches you, the current “clown world” suddenly makes total sense.

By the way: you can check out a free audiobook of 1984 here.

Why I Don’t Recommend Writing on Medium

In 2024, I wrote 365 articles on Medium to test whether the platform was worth it.

Well… I lied a little. I wanted to write 365 articles, but about halfway through the year, Medium decided to ban me. Here’s why.

The Beginning

After writing close to 50 articles, Medium restricted my account features in February. I couldn’t believe it. I was only writing about my author project, my YouTube channel, and my freelancing work. Nothing controversial at all. Yet, a small banner appeared at the top of my homepage saying my account had been banned for violating Medium’s community guidelines.

When I reached out, they replied two weeks later:

Oops, our bad. The automated censorship system — which we don’t officially call a ‘censorship system’ — somehow confused your blog with someone else’s. Here’s your account back. Have fun writing for Medium — the best platform for authors on the web!

Three months later, my account features were restricted again. This time, I assumed it was another automated error. But a week later, they told me I was banned for good for violating community guidelines.

Which guidelines did I violate? They didn’t say.
How did I violate them? No explanation.
Which article caused the ban? Still no answer.

Like many social media platforms, Medium has vague community guidelines that prohibit posting “hateful content.” What counts as hateful? They don’t specify. This gives them the option to shut down any user they dislike.

Write something pro-conservative, and you might get banned in a liberal climate. Write pro-liberal, and the same thing could happen when the political tide changes. It’s absurd.

I considered my Medium writing to be very tame. I never used swear words, insulted anyone, or posted negative comments. Yet I got booted.

Meanwhile, there’s literally pornography on Medium — really explicit and graphic stuff — and that’s apparently fine. But expressing a mild political opinion? That’s where Medium draws the line.


My Thoughts on Medium

Enough about my ban. Here’s what I learned from six months on Medium:

  1. Medium gives you an audience faster than a website
    I did get readers. I didn’t achieve fame, but once I paid $5/month to join the Partner Program, I earned a few dollars here and there. My estimate: after 365 articles, starting from zero, I might have broken even — averaging about $5/month after a year.
  2. Viral articles don’t necessarily pay well
    One article “went viral” by my small-profile standards: 180 views, 90 reads, and it earned me 4 cents. Yes, 4 cents. Some magazines pay that per word, which puts Medium’s pay into perspective.
  3. There are “whales” on Medium
    The real money comes from readers who pay $15/month. Their reads are worth more than average. Without attracting these whales, making a living is nearly impossible.
  4. I liked the design
    Medium is clean, reader-friendly, and visually pleasing. I’ve tried to replicate some of that design on my own website.
  5. Organic growth is possible, but limited
    Following people who follow you is a simple trick to gain initial subscribers. The more followers you have, the more your articles appear in feeds.
  6. Most content is generic
    Many successful Medium writers write about how to succeed on Medium — a ponzi-like cycle where success breeds advice for the less successful. Unique voices are rare. And for political writing? Be liberal, preferably an Obama fan.
  7. Medium’s payment system is essentially a ponzi scheme
    Users pay at least $5/month, some of which goes to writers. But a large portion goes to Medium itself. Not everyone can earn their money back, let alone make a living in that system, as this would make Medium become unviable.
  8. AI writing floods the platform
    Articles like “10 unknown facts about the Great Wall” are now everywhere, generated in seconds. Medium is swamped with AI content, making reading less enjoyable.
  9. Your platform can be taken away overnight
    The biggest flaw: you can be banned without explanation. No second chance, no appeal. You’re building Medium’s platform, not your own.

When to Write on Medium

If your content is non-political and you want to reach an audience quickly, Medium can work. Post daily articles on topics like cooking, travel, or investing. Follow people and mention in your profile that you refollow everyone. Once you have an audience, write about how to write and make money on Medium.

Don’t expect to break even in the first year, and don’t expect to earn more than $100/month anytime soon.


When Not to Write on Medium

If you want the freedom to speak your mind, avoid Medium. Build your own website, grow your audience, and sell books or services when the demand is there.

Your website — and your writing — is yours. Whatever you do on Medium will never truly be yours.

Why Everyone Needs a Website

People started moving to social media around 2016. I’d noticed the decline of truly worthwhile blogs to read about ten years ago. But I believe that trend is about to reverse.

Social media gives you access to a large audience, and people often expect you to have at least a Twitter account if you’re a public figure. I get that. I use Twitter and YouTube myself — and maybe, in the future, I’ll increase efforts on Instagram too.

However, the way these platforms have evolved makes having your own website more important than ever. I was banned from Medium over a year ago without a single warning, I’m fairly sure YouTube shadow-bans my channel, and German Twitter is full with state censorship for those who don’t align with the mainstream narrative.

On my website, nobody can censor me. I can write what I want and speak my mind freely on here. Some will like it, others will hate it — but no one can deplatform me here. Sure, Google might bury content it doesn’t like in the search results, but once I’ve built a loyal readership and mailing list, Google’s influence over me fades.

For authors, maintaining a blog is especially valuable because it’s a simple (and free) way for readers to discover and get into your work. I often give away books for free, but blogging is another way for potential readers to get to know me without any commitment. If you enjoy my blog, you’ll enjoy my books — guaranteed.

But I believe a website is essential for any public figure. In the near future, hosting video content will likely become very affordable. At that point, anyone could host their own vlogs, video essays, podcasts, and livestreams directly on their own site. Add a payment processor that doesn’t discriminate by political beliefs, and the bubble of mainstream media control could finally burst — giving rise to a new golden age of citizen journalism. No add AI video making and anyone could make Hollywood quality movies and post (and sell) them on their own website.

Even if you’re not an author, social commentator, vlogger, or influencer, a website is still for you. At the very least, it serves as your personal business card — a place to showcase your projects and interests. Whether you study math, play college sports, work as a plumber, invest in crypto or dividends, or love to travel — create a website and write about it. You might not become a famous influencer or make big money from it, but it will open doors.

And I’m not just talking about professional opportunities — personal ones, too. Let’s say you love riding motorbikes. With a website, you’ll quickly connect with other enthusiasts in your area. If you love reading, authors might start sending you free books or you’ll get great book recommendations by other readers. If you’re passionate about a sports team and write about them for fun, you might gain better access to games in the future.

A website simply builds credibility — in every area. And it does that far better than social media can for the average person. Sure, having a million Twitter followers is great, but what about smaller accounts like mine, with only around a thousand? Nobody cares about these accounts as they’re a dime a dozen.

A website with just 1,000 monthly readers, on the other hand, is something real — a meaningful platform that connects you with potential friends, collaborators, and opportunities.

Wednesday Season 2 (Movie/Show Review #3)

The first season of Wednesday was great in many ways — from the directing and set design to the acting and the story. It all worked. I especially hope whoever choreographed Wednesday’s dance scene got a massive raise, because that moment was pure perfection.

It seemed like everyone loved it, so it’s no surprise that Netflix ordered more. (I’ve heard at least three seasons are planned.)

I finally got around to watching the eight-episode second season last week, and I have to say — it’s still good. The production quality remains top-notch. The directing, sets, score, and characters are all on par with Hollywood-level filmmaking. You can clearly tell when Tim Burton was more involved in directing, though, as his episodes once again stand out as the highlights of the season.

However, the writing has taken a noticeable dip. There are simply too many characters, each with their own side plot. As a result, the main storyline feels diluted and reduced to a framework that merely ties all the other plots together.

Another major issue is the miscasting of Gomez and Morticia. This was already a weak point in the first season, though it wasn’t too distracting since both characters had limited screen time. Unfortunately, they get much more focus this season — and it hurts the show. Nothing against Luis Guzmán, but his portrayal of Gomez just isn’t my cup of tea. He turns the character into a comedic oddball, lacking the charm and sophistication of his predecessors. Catherine Zeta-Jones looks almost frozen in place — her expression so stiff that it conveys little to no emotion thanks to lots of botox sessions I’d assume. When the two share a scene, their lack of chemistry makes things even more awkward.

Overall, everything the first season did great, the second does worse. But as the first season was so well done, the second still turns out to be good. But is Season 2 a must-watch? Sadly, no.