How to Invest 1,000 Dollars

A couple of years ago, Bitcoin was the best place to put 1,000 dollars. I believed in BTC, invested some money, and happened to be right. Luck played a significant role in that. Bitcoin could have been regulated into oblivion, rejected by the masses, or crashed to zero because a few whales decided to sell. Fortunately, none of that happened.

Despite being lucky with BTC, I would have advised my younger self not to invest that 1,000 dollars in Bitcoin, but to invest it in yourself instead.

Investing in Bitcoin involved considerable risk—just like investing in stocks. Even government bonds are risky nowadays, especially with the looming threat of hyperinflation. Most traditional assets no longer offer a return on investment (ROI) that outpaces inflation.

Investing in yourself, however, is independent of legislation, regulation, or inflation; it depends solely on you.

If you put 1,000 dollars into the S&P 500, you might end up with 1,100 dollars next year (if it was a good year), but taxes and inflation could easily eat up that profit. On the other hand, spending 1,000 dollars on a camera and learning photography could pay dividends for decades. You gain a new skill with the potential to generate income. Best of all, you control the risk—your success with that investment depends on your own effort, not on unpredictable government decisions that no one could foresee unless they’re Nancy Pelosi’s husband.

That’s why I would encourage you: If you’ve got $1,000 invest it into learning a new skill.

  • Buy a website hosting plan and start a blog
  • Take a painting class
  • Get a gym membership
  • Pick up a guitar and learn to play
  • Start learning a new language
  • Grab a GoPro and try moto-vlogging

This is where 1,000 dollars is best spent as it can turn into a new business, income stream, or at least a new hobby that enriches your life.

Writing Tips From Robert Heinlein

Heinlein is one of my favorite Sci-Fi authors — if you haven’t seen it already, watch Predestination which is based on a Heinlein short-story for a nice mindfuck and a general idea of what a great writer (and thinker) Heinlein was.

During some reading about his work I stumbled across six simple rules Heinlein set up for aspiring writers:

  1. You must write
  2. Finish what you started
  3. You must refrain from rewriting, except to editorial order
  4. You must put your story on the market
  5. You must keep it on the market until it has sold
  6. Start working on something else

I love it. It is minimalist, it is based on free market principles, it is about doing the work.

Robert Heinlein was a libertarian which shines through his writing. And his approach to being a writer goes in the same direction: Do the work and let the people decide if you stuff is good enough or not. In the end: Not all good writing sells, but all writing that sells is good.

How far can I get as an indie writer?

I’ve decided to apply Heinlein’s rules to my own pursuit as a writer some time ago. 1,000 words a day is my minimum goal which will results in at least 365K words a year.

This leaves me with at least 4 full novels by the end of each year. By doing my own editing, translating, and cover design, I can keep the cost low. The marketing is a different beast, sure. I’m writing this blog, doing YouTube, and writing short stories on top to get something going.

Will I succeed?

Only time will tell—and the free market.

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury (Books to Read #5)

I had to read this book in school and didn’t like it. I thought I should give it a second shot as an adult, especially since so much of what the story warns about seems to have become reality. But after reading it again, my verdict is the same: I still don’t like it very much. But I still think that it’s a must read.

The novel depicts a dystopian future in which firemen exist to burn books. Only controlled mass media is considered acceptable for the public to consume, because books contain dangerous ideas that might cause people to question their systematic sedation.

“Book burning stretched into 200 pages” might be the simplest way to sum it up.

Fahrenheit 451 in Modern Times

Getting people banned on Twitter, removing their videos from YouTube, or making websites unsearchable on Google is the modern equivalent of book burning. Books are just one medium for transferring ideas from one human to another—social media posts and websites serve the same purpose.

Guy Montag is the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451. He works as a fireman but slowly begins to question his role. After sparing a book from being burned, he gets caught in a spiral that pulls him down the rabbit hole of self-discovery. The more books he saves and reads, the more he questions the system he was born into. Naturally, the authorities push back.

It sounds a lot like people encountering alternative ideas on social media and beginning to question what they see in mainstream news.

Why I Don’t Like The Book

The story itself isn’t the issue. It’s a quick read, moving from A to B in a straightforward way, and the pacing is solid. The message isn’t a problem either—I enjoy dystopian novels that try to wake readers from a state-induced slumber.

However, there’s something about Bradbury’s writing style that I simply don’t enjoy. His metaphors are overly colorful, and he often uses five sentences to express what could be said in one. I’ve always had this issue with Bradbury, which is why I stopped reading his work long before picking up Fahrenheit 451 again.

Bradbury is celebrated as one of the greatest sci-fi authors of all time, with plenty of awards and millions in royalties. So perhaps it’s just my personal taste getting in the way.

Even though it wasn’t to my liking, it remains a dystopian classic that everyone should read at least once. It’s not 1984 or A Brave New World, but it’s still an important book.

Btw, if you don’t like reading, there is also a movie adaption from 1966.

A remake was done in 2018 that I completely missed. It seems to have a big budget, as it could attract Michael B. Jordan and Michael Shannon, but the reviews aren’t promising.

So, Nico Harrison Was Fired

Everyone saw it coming—except Nico Harrison. The Mavs GM seemed to think he was smarter than everyone else by trading Luka Doncic because, in his words, “defense wins championships.”

Trading Luka was the dumbest move a Mavericks GM could ever make. But trading him without shopping around the league for multiple offers to get the best deal? That was pure lunacy.

Anthony Davis is a great player, but with his injury history, he’s a part-time player who very likely won’t carry a full playoff run—let alone a full season.

When the trade happened, you had to wonder: why didn’t the Mavs also try to get Austin Reaves? A deal that included both Davis and Reaves would have at least made some sense—but Nico Harrison couldn’t even pull that off.

Ask yourself: where would the Mavs be now without the lucky (or rigged) first draft pick that resulted in Cooper Flagg? Davis is injured again. They lost the play-ins last year, and they’re on track to miss them this year. From Finals to no play-offs in one trade—well done. On Monday, the Mavs had their first home game in more than two decades that wasn’t sold out.

This is what happens when someone thinks they know better than everyone else. “Time will tell,” Nico said. Well, time is up—and it spoke very clearly: the Doncic trade was the dumbest trade in NBA history, maybe even in all of sports history. I wouldn’t be surprised if Nico Harrison never gets another job in the NBA ever again—or in any other profession in Dallas.

9 Reasons to Have Numbers in Your Headlines (Number 5 Will Surprise You)

BuzzFeed used to do it with almost every single article. I once discovered a website that covered many of my interests—stories, tech, fitness, online growth, and more. On Medium and countless blogs, you’ll find the same pattern. I must have read thousands of those number/list-articles.

Why do they all use numbered headlines? Because they work — until they don’t.

BuzzFeed was the worst thing that ever happened to writing on the internet—but it wasn’t really BuzzFeed’s fault. They simply optimized for what people clicked on. At some point, they realized that “7 Ways to Lose Weight (Number 3 Will Surprise You)” performed far better than “A Comprehensive Guide to Losing Weight.” Since their goal was to maximize clicks, they leaned heavily into this style of writing.

However, I don’t use that structure—and I don’t recommend that you do either.

Here’s why: Despite reading thousands of articles with that format, I can’t remember a single website besides BuzzFeed where I found them. No joke, no exaggeration. I don’t remember the authors, the bloggers, or the magazines. They’ve simply vanished from my memory.

I can’t recall a single specific article that used this formula. “7 Ways to Build Muscle Fast”? I couldn’t tell you even one of the seven.

Why is that?

Because articles with numbered headlines are like fast food. They look tempting, they’re marketed well, but once you’ve consumed them, you realize you’ve gained nothing of lasting value. You still remember that night you had a steak at a five-star restaurant—but you probably don’t remember your first Big Mac.

Fast-food number/list-articles are the same. You consume them, digest them, shit them out, and forget them—almost immediately afterwards you crave something real.

Of course, not every numbered article is of low quality. But by now, too many creators have abused the formula, stuffing low-value content down our throats. Whenever I see a “numbers post,” I just skip it.

Write lists or write something personal.

Numbered posts are the opposite of personal writing. They don’t tell the reader who you are or give them a reason to come back.

Just like you don’t care about returning to McDonald’s because there is another one at every corner, you don’t care about that site with the numbers articles because they can be found all over the internet.

BuzzFeed News is already gone, and BuzzFeed Inc. is struggling financially. The biggest example of “number-post” success has turned into a case study in short-term rise and mid-term failure—and that doesn’t surprise me at all.

If you want to build a real relationship with your readers—or any relationship at all—stay away from numbered headlines and formulas.